How we work
How a project moves from first message to handover.
This is the approach we use on our own platforms and bring to client work. It describes the order of work and what you receive, not a fixed schedule.
Step 1
Start with a clear request
The contact form has three paths: plan a build, request a technical review, or set up integrations and data. It records the engagement type, your market, the systems you already use, and where you found us, so the first conversation starts from facts.
Step 2
Understand the system before choosing the architecture
Our default is a modular monolith with clear contracts between modules. We move to separate or event-driven services only where there is a reason, such as independent scaling, delivery guarantees, or separate ownership.
Read how this works in practice: Why We Start with a Modular MonolithStep 3
Build in modules, with automated checks
Each business area is a module with its own routes, services and data. In our own repositories, scans for module boundaries and tenant isolation run as commands, so the structure is enforced by tooling and not by memory.
Read how this works in practice: Checking Module Boundaries with Commands, Not ReviewsStep 4
Release in a fixed order, and check health
Releases follow one written order: migrate, rebuild caches, reload workers, verify health. Each service has its own health check, so a failure points at the layer that failed.
Read how this works in practice: Health Checks and a Fixed Release Order for a Docker StackStep 5
Hand over what your team needs to run it
Architecture notes, runbooks and setup guides ship with the code, and mobile work includes maintenance runbooks and smoke-test checklists.
What this page does not promise
We do not publish fixed timelines or prices, because both depend on scope. They are confirmed in writing after we understand the system, not before.
Tell us where you are in this process.
Starting something new, or taking over something that already exists.